Denial management

Denials triaged, worked and traced to their cause.

Denial categorisation, root cause analysis, corrected claims, reconsiderations and appeals - plus removing the cause.

Get a Free RCM Assessment Revenue leakage calculator

Sample denial work queueFictional practice · Payers A, B and C · 11 open cardsIllustrative data

Illustrative data: invented denial cards for a fictional practice, showing how work moves between stages. No outcome or rate is implied. Not a Kitronixe client result.

New Denials3 cards

D-2041Payer AEligibilityNew
D-2043Payer CCodingNew
D-2044Payer BDuplicateNew

Researching2 cards

D-2032Payer BDocumentationDue Soon
D-2036Payer APayer processingNew

Correction Needed2 cards

D-2027Payer CCoordination of benefitsDue Soon
D-2029Payer ACodingNew

Appeal / Reconsideration2 cards

D-2018Payer BMedical necessityEscalation Needed
D-2022Payer AAuthorizationDue Soon

Payer Follow-Up2 cards

D-2011Payer CPayer processingDue Soon
D-2015Payer BTimely filingEscalation Needed

Resolved2 cards

D-2003Payer AEligibilityClosed
D-2006Payer CDuplicateClosed

Each card sits in the column for its current step. Age bands: New, Due Soon and Escalation Needed.

Two jobs, not one

Fix the claim. Then fix the reason.

Working a denial recovers one claim. Finding out why it was denied and fixing that upstream stops the next two hundred. Kitronixe does both, and reports on both separately so you can see which is which.

Denials are categorised by payer, reason and root cause, so the pattern behind a hundred individual write-offs becomes visible.

What happens when denials are only reworked

Denials are worked once and abandoned
A denial that is overturnable on appeal gets written off because nobody had capacity.
The same denial keeps happening
Each one is treated as an isolated event rather than a symptom.

Each rework recovers one claim at most. The cause is still in place for the next one.

Cause map

Every denial grows from a branch of the cycle.

A payer’s reason code says what was refused, not where the problem started. Select a cause to see what is reviewed, the usual next action and where the denial could have been prevented.

DenialFour branches, ten causes

Front endRegistration, coverage and authorization
EligibilityFront end branch · Registration, coverage and authorization
What is reviewed
Coverage on the date of service, plan and subscriber details, and whether the patient’s coverage changed.
Typical next action
Correct the coverage details and resubmit to the right payer where the claim is billable; otherwise route it to patient-balance review under practice policy.
Upstream prevention opportunity
Verification before the visit, with a fresh check for returning patients whose coverage may have changed.
Mid-cycleDocumentation and coding
Back endSubmission and follow-up
Payer sideThe payer’s own processing

EligibilityFront end branch · Registration, coverage and authorization

What is reviewed: Coverage on the date of service, plan and subscriber details, and whether the patient’s coverage changed.
Typical next action: Correct the coverage details and resubmit to the right payer where the claim is billable; otherwise route it to patient-balance review under practice policy.
Upstream prevention opportunity: Verification before the visit, with a fresh check for returning patients whose coverage may have changed.

Denial lifecycle

Seven stages, and not every denial takes the same road.

Every denial is received, categorised and reviewed for its cause. What happens next depends on that cause. Choose a route to see which stages it uses.

Choose a route

When the claim itself was wrong and the fix is supported by the record.

Step 1: Denial Received
The denial arrives on a remittance or status response and is logged with payer, reason and date.
On this route: Logged from the remittance
Step 2: Categorize
Grouped by payer, reason and likely cause, so similar denials can be worked together.
On this route: Grouped with similar denials
Step 3: Root Cause Review
What actually went wrong: coverage, authorization, coding, documentation, timing or the payer.
On this route: Cause found: an error on the claim
Step 4: Correct / Appeal / Reconsider
The action the denial needs, based on its cause and on what the payer allows.
On this route: Correct the claim
Step 5: Resubmit / Follow Up
The corrected claim or appeal goes out, and follow-up continues until the payer answers.
On this route: Resubmit as a corrected claim and track it
Step 6: Resolution
Paid, upheld or closed, always with the reason written down.
On this route: Paid, or reviewed again
Step 7: Prevention Feedback
The cause is taken back to the team or step where it started.
On this route: The fix goes back to the step that made the error

Triage to prevention

One desk, four moves on every denial.

The work runs in the same order each time, from sorting the queue to stopping the next denial.

Step 1Triage
Sort by cause, payer and time left.
Categorisation
By payer, reason code, provider and root cause.
Step 2Correct / appeal
Route each denial to its fix.
Appeals and reconsiderations
Worked to deadline, with supporting documentation.
Step 3Prevent
Remove the cause upstream.
Root cause removal
The upstream change that stops the denial recurring.
Step 4Track
Show what keeps coming back.
Trend reporting
Which denials are preventable, what each issue is affecting, and where corrective action may reduce repeat work.

Timely action

Deadlines are per denial, not per rule of thumb.

There is no single appeal deadline. Windows vary by payer, plan, contract and appeal level, so Kitronixe records the window that applies to each denial and works to it. We do not quote a deadline without the payer’s terms in front of us.

Step 1: Window recorded with the denial
When a denial is logged, the appeal or reconsideration window that applies to it is noted, depending on payer and contract.
Step 2: Worked with time left in view
The queue is ordered by time remaining as well as balance, so a small claim near its window is not buried.
Step 3: Escalated before it closes
Items approaching their window move from Due Soon to Escalation Needed and are reviewed by a lead.
Step 4: Submission documented
Proof of when and how each appeal was sent is kept with the denial, in case the payer asks.

Prevention loop

The last step of a denial is the front of the cycle.

Correcting today’s claim is half the job. The loop closes when what was learned reaches the people and steps where the denial started: registration, verification, authorization, documentation or coding.

Step 1 of 6

Denial

A denial arrives and is logged against its payer and reason.

After step 6, the loop returns to step 1, at the front of the cycle.

DenialA denial arrives and is logged against its payer and reason.
Root CauseThe real cause is identified, which is often not the reason code itself.
Correct Current ClaimToday’s claim is corrected, appealed or closed on its own merits.
Identify Upstream ProcessThe step where the problem began is named: a desk, a workflow, a template or a payer rule.
Feed Learning Back to TeamThe team at that step sees the examples and agrees the change with the practice.
Reduce Repeat Workflow ErrorsThe change is checked in later denial reports, and the loop starts again where it is still needed.
Back to step 1, at the front of the cycle

Denial trends

See where the work piles up, and why.

One view of open denial work, by root-cause category or by stage. Counts, not percentages: the point is to see which causes and which steps are holding the queue.

Open denial work by root-cause categoryIllustrative data

Illustrative data: invented counts of open denial work for a fictional practice in one sample month. Counts only, no rates. Not a Kitronixe client result.

Eligibility14
Coding11
Authorization9
Documentation8
Payer processing7
Medical necessity6
Coordination of benefits5
Duplicate4
Timely filing3
Other2

69 open sample items in all.

What management reporting covers

Open denials by cause and age
Where the open work sits and how close each item is to its window.
Repeat causes by upstream step
Which causes keep recurring and which team or step they trace back to.
Appeals in progress and decided
What has been submitted, what is awaiting the payer and what was decided.
Prevention actions and follow-through
The changes agreed with the practice and whether the cause has recurred since.
Write-off decisions with reasons
Every closed-without-payment item, with the reason and who approved it.

Want a rough sense of what denials might be costing your practice? Put in your own figures and get a range. Open the revenue leakage calculator

Where Denial Management sits in your revenue cycle

01Patient Scheduling & Pre-Registration
02Eligibility & Benefits Verification
03Prior Authorization
04Charge Capture
05Medical Coding
06Claim Scrubbing & Submission
07Payment Posting & Reconciliation
08Denial Management & Appeals (this service)
09A/R Follow-Up & Recovery (this service)
10Patient Billing & Collections
11Reporting, Analytics & Revenue Integrity

08Denial Management & Appeals· Back End
09A/R Follow-Up & Recovery· Back End

Where the work happens

The systems denial work runs through.

Denials are worked in your systems and accounts, with the evidence for each one kept alongside it.

Claim statusStatus responses and remittance detail show what was denied and the reason given.
Payer portalWhere the payer allows it, reconsiderations, attachments and status checks go through the portal.
ClearinghouseRejection and acceptance reports, which also serve as proof of when a claim was submitted.
Appeal documentationLetters, supporting records and proof of submission, filed with each denial in your systems.

Upstream and alongside

Denial questions

Questions about denial work

All FAQs

Do you appeal every denial?

No. Each denial is triaged first. Some need a corrected claim rather than an appeal, some need information from the patient or the payer, and some are not supported by the documentation or not worth pursuing under your policy. Those go to write-off review with the reason recorded, and the decision is yours.

How do you identify repeat denial causes?

Every denial is categorised by payer, reason and root cause, not only by the payer’s reason code. When the same cause shows up across several claims, it is traced to the step where it started - registration, authorization, coding, documentation or submission - and reported with the examples that show it.

How are deadlines tracked?

The window that applies to each denial is recorded when it is logged, based on the payer and, where applicable, your contract. The queue is worked with the time remaining in view, and items approaching their window are escalated. We do not work from one assumed deadline for every payer.

What happens when an appeal is unsuccessful?

The decision and the payer’s reasoning are recorded. Where the payer offers a further level and the documentation supports it, we discuss with you whether to take it. Otherwise the item goes to write-off review with you. Either way the cause is fed back so it is less likely to recur.

Can you work denials that are already months old?

Often, but nothing is promised in advance. Older denials are reviewed for what is still possible: some remain inside the payer’s window, some can be supported with proof of timely action, and some can no longer be recovered. We tell you which is which before the work starts.

Bring us the denials that keep coming back.

Tell us where denials pile up today. We will talk through how triage, appeals and root-cause work would run in your systems, without asking for any patient information.